This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP. dbenbenn | talk 00:27, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep as reasoned by Samaritan. — Ливай | ☺ 22:23, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
keep more than obviously fits within "Wikipedia is not paper" and probably fits within encyclopedic. Mozzerati 22:29, 2005 Feb 2 (UTC)
Keep and expand. A four star US General as he was has definite potential to be encyclopedic and given his current role, he is definitely notable.Capitalistroadster 10:05, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Have added some info on his military career including South Korea and the Gulf War. I have also added it as a military stub.Capitalistroadster 05:04, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
keep I realize now that I was too quick to just hit the VfD key. Expansion would be the way to go, IMO. Dismas 11:13, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This was a keeper to begin with, and even moreso with Capitalistroadster's fine additions. GRider\talk 22:22, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.